Indian Tribes & Native American Lands

Don’t Waive Tribal Sovereignty

In the rapidly evolving world of wireless communication, Native American Tribes are increasingly being approached by wireless carriers seeking access to tribal lands for the installation of cell towers and related infrastructure. While such partnerships can bring meaningful economic benefits to tribal communities, they also come with significant risks—particularly when it comes to preserving tribal sovereignty.

At Airwave Advisors, we have proudly supported Tribes such as the Nooksack Indian Tribe in Deming, WA, and the Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribe in Kingston, WA, in navigating these complex negotiations. In this article, we explore why tribal sovereignty should never be waived in lease agreements and how tribal governments can approach negotiations from a position of strength, ensuring the long-term protection of their rights and resources.

---

Understanding Tribal Sovereignty

Tribal sovereignty refers to the inherent authority of Indigenous Tribes to govern themselves within the borders of the United States. Recognized by the federal government as “domestic dependent nations,” Tribes have the power to enact laws, manage lands, and maintain their own judicial systems. This unique legal status provides Tribes with autonomy in matters ranging from taxation and zoning to economic development and dispute resolution.

Preserving this sovereignty is paramount when engaging with outside entities, including wireless carriers. Unfortunately, one of the most frequent and troubling requests we see in lease negotiations is for Tribes to waive their sovereign rights—often buried deep in the legal fine print.

The Hidden Threat: Waiving Sovereignty in Legal Language

Wireless tenants often include language in their proposed lease agreements that requires Tribes to waive sovereign immunity or to resolve disputes in state or federal courts located off-reservation. On the surface, this may seem like a harmless legal clause, but it carries dangerous implications.

Here’s why:

• Loss of Legal Jurisdiction: By agreeing to litigate disputes in non-tribal courts, Tribes relinquish their right to enforce their own laws and resolve conflicts under tribal governance.
• Weakened Position in Disputes: Off-reservation courts may not be familiar with the complexities of tribal law, placing Tribes at a disadvantage.
• Setting Precedent: Once a Tribe waives sovereignty in one lease, it can set a precedent that other tenants will seek to follow.

The key message here is simple: never waive tribal sovereignty in a lease agreement. There is no compelling reason a Tribe should be required to settle disputes in jurisdictions like California or Washington when the transaction occurs on sovereign tribal land.

Common Pressure Tactics from Wireless Tenants

Wireless carriers are sophisticated negotiators, often backed by teams of experienced attorneys. It is not uncommon for them to:

• Present standardized lease agreements that favor the carrier’s interests
• Argue that waiver clauses are “standard industry practice”
• Imply that refusing these terms will jeopardize the deal

These tactics are designed to create pressure and urgency. But Tribes must recognize that they are offering something of great value: access to strategic land in a rapidly growing industry. Carriers need tribal land, and Tribes have every right to set terms that reflect their legal status, community priorities, and long-term interests.

---

Negotiating From a Position of Strength

When entering into lease negotiations, Tribes must approach the process with clarity, confidence, and expert guidance. Here are key principles to guide successful outcomes:

1. Use Tribal Lease Templates

Rather than accepting the tenant’s lease agreement, Tribes should provide their own lease template that aligns with tribal law and governance. This shifts the negotiation dynamic and puts the Tribe in control of the legal framework.

2. Include Jurisdiction and Venue Clauses

All disputes should be governed by tribal law and resolved in tribal court. Clearly stating this in the agreement ensures that sovereignty is protected and that the Tribe retains authority over its own land.

3. Define the Scope of Use and Compliance

The lease should outline acceptable uses of the land, technical specifications, and compliance with all tribal environmental, zoning, and cultural resource regulations.

4. Set Clear Financial Terms

Wireless tenants may undervalue the lease opportunity. Tribes should conduct independent lease valuations to determine fair market rent, escalation clauses, co-location fees, and other revenue streams.

5. Protect Against Unauthorized Transfers

Include clauses that prevent the tenant from transferring the lease or subleasing the site without tribal consent.

---

Why Expert Help Makes All the Difference

Tribes negotiating with wireless carriers are up against highly experienced professionals. Without expert assistance, it’s easy to miss subtle provisions that can erode sovereignty or undervalue tribal land.

That’s where we come in.

At Airwave Advisors, we bring over a decade of experience in cell tower lease negotiations, working with both private landowners and tribal governments. Founder and President Nick G. Foster understands the carrier’s playbook and has successfully tipped the scales in favor of clients across the country.

When you work with Airwave Advisors, you receive:

• Custom Lease Drafting: Agreements tailored to tribal governance and legal frameworks
• Lease Valuation Expertise: Independent assessments to ensure fair compensation
• Strategic Negotiation Support: Guidance on key terms, deal structure, and counteroffers
• Ongoing Advisory Services: Assistance with lease renewals, amendments, buyouts, and compliance

We are proud to carry the necessary insurance, qualifications, and cultural sensitivity required to support Native American communities in protecting their lands and legal rights.

---

Real-World Experience: Partnering with Tribes

We have proudly partnered with Tribes across the U.S., including:

• Nooksack Indian Tribe – Assisted in structuring a new lease agreement aligned with tribal law.
• Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribe – Negotiated favorable terms while preserving sovereign jurisdiction.

These partnerships demonstrate that Tribes can achieve equitable, respectful, and profitable outcomes when equipped with the right tools and allies.

---

Final Thoughts: Sovereignty Is Non-Negotiable

As wireless infrastructure continues to expand into tribal lands, now is the time for Native American governments to take control of the negotiation process. By refusing to waive sovereignty and insisting on fair, culturally sensitive agreements, Tribes can both secure financial benefits and protect their self-determination.

Don’t enter negotiations without an advocate who understands your rights, values your land, and fights for your future.

---

Need Help With Your Cell Tower Lease?

Give Us A Call Today

(888) 443-5101